Grammar Teaching: Implicit or Explicit?

Based on my 15 years of EFL (English as a Foreignas easily or as well as children. Acquisition, however, is
Language) teaching experience, the statementthe most important means for gaining linguistic skills. A
"grammar teaching should be implicit, not explicit" couldperson's first language (L1) is primarily learned in this
be argued both for and against. Whether to teachway. This manner of developing language skills typically
grammar as an extracted focus of ELT (Englishemploys implicit grammar teaching and learning.
Language Teaching) or more passively as an inductive,Grammar teaching should be explicit
integral topic has been the theme of countlessThis does not exclude explicit grammar-teaching
debates on the part of institutions, professors,entirely, however. Some basic features of English
grammarians and language researchers for decades.language grammar structure are illogical or dissimilar to
Grammar is the branch of linguistics dealing with thespeakers of other languages and do not readily lend
form and structure of words or morphology, and theirthemselves to being well understood, even in context.
interrelation in sentences, called syntax. The study ofIn cases where features of English grammar are
grammar reveals how language works, an importantdiametrically opposed or in some other way radically
aspect in both English acquisition and learning.different from the manner of expression in the
In the early 20th century grammarians like thestudent's L1, explicit teaching may be required.
German-American anthropologist Franz Boas and theAspects of English language grammar that may offer
Danish linguist Otto Jespersen began to describeexceptional challenge to EFL students include use of
languages and Boas' work formed the basis of variousword order, determiners (this, that, these, those, a, an,
types of American descriptive grammar study.the), prepositions (in, on, at, by, for, from, of), auxiliaries
Jespersen's work was the fore-runner of such current(do, be, have), conjunctions (but, so, however, therefore,
approaches to linguistic theory such as Noamthough, although), interrogatives, intensifiers (some, any,
Chomsky's Transformational Generative Grammar.few, more, too) and distinctions between modal verbs
Chomsky, who studied structural linguistics, sought to(can, could, would, should, may, might, must). Phrasal
analyze the syntax of English in a structural grammar.verbs also present considerable difficulty to Spanish
This led him to view grammar as a theory of languagespeakers learning communicative English.
structure rather than a description of actual sentences.Some students also are logical or linguistically-biased
His idea of grammar is that it is a device for producingthinkers who respond well to structured presentation
the structure, not of a particular language, but of theof new material. Logical-Mathematical and
ability to produce and understand sentences in any andVerbal-Linguistic intelligence learners are prime
all languages. Since grammar is the means by whichexamples of those that would respond well to explicit
we can understand how a language "works", agrammar teaching in many cases.
definitive study of language grammar is essential toBased on my English language teaching and on my
language study.second and third foreign language learning (L2, L3)
Strictly explicit grammar study however, and evenexperience, an exclusive approach using either implicit
grammar-focused lessons are often notor explicit methodologies is not as effective as utilizing
communicatively based. They can therefore be boring,one or the other of these approaches as required.
cumbersome and difficult for students to assimilate.Although it is essential to teach elements of language
The strict teaching of grammar / structure, exceptand develop communicative abilities in our students,
with students of the Logical - Mathematical or Verbal -there is no one best way to introduce and provide
Linguistic multiple intelligences, can be frustrating andpractice in them. Young learners have more natural
highly ineffective.facility in acquisition, while adults may benefit
Grammar teaching should be implicitsubstantially from more "formal" language learning.
In the early 20th century, Jespersen, like Boas, thoughtLearning styles and intelligence strengths are also a
grammar should be studied by examining living speechsignificant factor.
rather than by analyzing written documents. ByThere are many generally accepted ways of
providing grammar in context, in an implicit manner, weintroducing the sounds, structure and vocabulary of
can expose students to substantial doses of grammarEnglish, including colloquial forms of conversation and
study without alienating them to the learning of Englishthe four basic communication skills. Grammar provides
or other foreign language. I also agree with this implicitfor "communicative economy". Grammar teaching
approach of teaching grammar. The principal manner inshould be implicit, or explicit, as teaching / learning
which I accomplish this is by teaching shortconditions may dictate helping to minimize the student
grammar-based sessions immediately followed byresponse teachers fear most, "Teacher, I don't
additional function-based lessons in which the newunderstand."
grammar / structure is applied in context.Note: Academic references for this article are
The hypothesis is that adult language students haveavailable on request.
two distinct ways of developing skills and knowledge inRelated language learning and teaching articles in this
a second language, acquisition and learning. Acquiring aseries available online include:
language is "picking it up", i.e., developing ability in a"Learning a Language: 6 Effective Ways to Use the
language by using it in natural, communicative situations.Internet"
Learning language differs in that it is "knowing the rules""Six Quick Tricks for Learning a Language"
and having a conscious knowledge of grammar /"What's the Strangest Thing you've Ever Eaten?"
structure. Adults acquire language, although usually not"What Makes a Person Intelligent?